This is an illustrative example. The papers,
journals and findings below are invented to show the layout. They are not real
studies, carry no identifiers, and are not medical advice. A real issue is built
only from published papers, each linked to its source.
Example issue — a neurologist following adult epilepsy
Three papers · weekly · example only
1. Example: a randomised trial of an add-on drug in drug-resistant focal epilepsy
Example Journal of Neurology · example date ·
Randomised controlled trial
An invented trial description showing how each card reads: what was asked, who
was studied, what was measured, and what the authors concluded. Two to four
sentences, taken only from the paper itself, with the uncertainty left in rather
than rounded away.
Why this was chosen for you: matches "adult epilepsy, drug-resistant
focal seizures"; excludes paediatric populations you asked to leave out.
Source link appears here in a real issue.
2. Example: a cohort study of seizure recurrence after medication withdrawal
Example Neurology Review · example date ·
Observational cohort
A second invented summary. Evidence type is stated plainly so a trial is never
confused with an observational finding, and the summary never adds a claim the
source does not make.
Why this was chosen for you: matches "withdrawal and relapse risk".
3. Example: a systematic review of EEG features and outcome
Example Reviews in Clinical Neurophysiology · example date
· Systematic review
A third invented summary. Photographs in real issues are licensed stock images
chosen for illustration only; they never depict the study or its participants.
Why this was chosen for you: matches "EEG prognosis".
Every issue ends with a one-click unsubscribe link, a link to your own
preferences, and buttons to mark a paper relevant or less relevant.
Start my own newsletter